Acer Aspire GX-781

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire GX-781  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire GX-781(KBL)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 372
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 31.1
26% 31.7 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 22.1
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 101 115 120 83 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 57.3
Write 19.3
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 95.4
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425U6AFR6N-UH Adata AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS 6GB
2400, 2400 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 32 60 19" 1280 961 GSM4AFA L1960TQ
Typical Aspire GX-781 Builds (Compare 1,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Acer Aspire GX-781

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback