Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 18:00
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 468
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 109
Parallax 135
97% 121 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 110
Splatting 102
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 43 9.4 41 0.1 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
HXY 240G 240GB
144GB free
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 167 51 42 43 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 234
Write 212
Mixed 214
SusWrite 80.6
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 16.5
78% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 30.5
57% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 195 187 195 172 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
348GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 129 129 130 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
524GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 0 0.8 0 79 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 133
Write 116
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 29.2
114% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
242% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-048.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1280 720 DWE0236 23.6 monitor
Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $696
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback