HP 750-514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 12:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 333
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 91 89 90 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 439
Write 102
Mixed 139
SusWrite 87.7
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 25.6
99% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 139
125% 197 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
739GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 165 164 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 163
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 167
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B44 MP59HT
Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback