Asrock H270M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 12:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 344
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 115
Parallax 130
101% 123 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 124
Splatting 107
109% 137 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 31 33 35 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
339GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 159 161 164 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 160
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 0 32" 1280 720 TCL0030 LCD TV
Typical H270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback