Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 862
85% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,319
82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 16CF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 131
Parallax 81.5
72% 100 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 74.1
67% 83.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 22 18 21 26 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 908
Write 914
Mixed 787
SusWrite 53.4
149% 666 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 1.7
58% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 136
118% 169 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 185%
Patriot M.2 P400 2048GB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.F.F.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 2147 2005 482 474 1319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2123
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,847
SusWrite 1,397
431% 1,915 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 41.6
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 288
267% 401 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 236%
Great: 523%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
64GB free
Firmware: ES2OA70K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 59.6
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 8.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback