Asus CM6850

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CM6850 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6850
Memory	15.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$137 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 77 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 145 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 348 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 7260) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 26.5 Parallax 32.2 20% 27.9 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 25.8 Splatting 24.7 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT03H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 309 297 270 237 196 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 436 Mixed 382 SusWrite 278 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 41.5 136% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 304 228% 303 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 119%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 115GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 186 184 192 193 193 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 684 Write 192 Mixed 298 SusWrite 188 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 4 71% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 166GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 99 95 101 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 39.6 Write 92.2 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 95.3 45% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 27GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 9.4 11 13 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 15.2 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 10.9 7% 10 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 41%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 215GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 115 116 117 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 114 Write 118 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 116 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 109%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 1.5TB free, PID 4001 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 154 162 161 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 115 Write 156 Mixed 133 SusWrite 158 199% 140 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 18.6 1,536% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 32.3 DQ Mixed 24.3 1,999% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 334%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 20GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	23.5"	1280 720	VSCDE2E VX2452 Series

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	99x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	10x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	6x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	8x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	11x
SLZ302G08-MDJHB 4x2GBUnknownBench 45%, 226 samples	7x
SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC RMB4GB684CA3-16IC 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 5 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16