RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 213

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 213  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I LX R2.0/RM/SI
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 153
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 411
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 60.9
50% 63.8 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 54.8
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 25 29 28 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 186
Write 119
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 26.5
20% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 0.7
27% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 2.5
8% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: MU2OA732
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 136 140 138 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 152
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 140
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 85%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.4 5 4.9 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.9
6% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA07B DELL U2412M
Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 213 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $427
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback