Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H12DSG-O-CPU
Memory997.4 GB free of 1024 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221102
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU1, 2 CPU, 64 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 28
2-Core 58.9
26% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 217
20% 167 Pts
64-Core 1,980
122% 1,980 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMC VD 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 161 157 117 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
Read 293
Write 187
Mixed 216
SusWrite 146
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 168
122% 162 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%
Avago SMC3108 11.5TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1148 1164 1045 1086 1056 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
109GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 21 20 13 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 141
Write 50.8
Mixed 53
SusWrite 27.6
76% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
127% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 32 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 283%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 11 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback