Lenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-  (all builds)
MotherboardLenovo -[7Z01CTO1WW]-
Memory994.3 GB free of 1024 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 98.5
42% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 350
31% 264 Pts
64-Core 3,098
192% 3,098 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lenovo RAID 530-8i 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 182 182 183 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 170
Mixed 245
SusWrite 180
204% 275 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.4
2,394% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 200%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
142% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 75.9
166% 58 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 25.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 283%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback