Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 18:13
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,118
103% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,576
98% 1,576 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.84
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 326
Parallax 328
5% 220 fps
MRender 463
Gravity 288
Splatting 209
249% 320 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
651GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1750 1489 1829 1875 1853 1845 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,400
Write 2,193
Mixed 2,181
SusWrite 1,774
481% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 86.5
276% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,190
896% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 345%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 471 474 477 485 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 459
Mixed 372
SusWrite 474
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 321
249% 341 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
93GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,484
Write 2,352
Mixed 2,274
529% 2,370 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93.1
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 1,197
901% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 194 208 197 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 247
Write 218
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 184
133% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.4
247% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
295GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 112 116 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 111
129% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 33.6
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 32.6
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 43 75 28.6" 1280 720 ACR0999 X28
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback