Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 250%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 252%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 297
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,121
103% 863 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
CLim: 3330 MHz, MLim: 5831 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
246% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 505
Parallax 364
293% 409 fps
MRender 472
Gravity 310
Splatting 224
261% 335 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 246%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
631GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 1684 1830 1822 1818 1825 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 2,284
Mixed 2,177
SusWrite 1,700
481% 2,138 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 78.6
251% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 1,192
898% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 332%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 476 464 456 451 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 466
Mixed 376
SusWrite 459
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 50
168% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 235
208% 312 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
92GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,367
Write 2,173
Mixed 2,098
494% 2,213 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 84.8
287% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 1,205
908% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 154 206 212 210 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 202
Mixed 68
SusWrite 181
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 33.5
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 32.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI MAG272QR
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback