User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemANGXUN
MotherboardANGXUN H311-DS4
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 21:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 723
78% 619 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 84.1
52% 69.8 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samco RX1 512GB SSD
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 1046 993 1045 500 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,475
Write 1,063
Mixed 890
SusWrite 783
235% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 23.8
157% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 286
285% 441 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 175%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 25.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA113 DELL P2219H
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback