Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 09:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 996
94% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,498
93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 390C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 194
Parallax 188
170% 197 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 144
Splatting 125
120% 151 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 56 65 64 63 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 466
Write 428
Mixed 431
SusWrite 85
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 46.1
160% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 144 153 144 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 144
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 148
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
348GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 151 151 145 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 145
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 149
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GF2400C16K4 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback