Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E5M/300E5L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5M-XF3BR
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 126
54% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 189
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C784) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 499 483 395 279 536 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 1,563
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 486
235% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 44.5
154% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 302
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 137%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 12E3 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.1% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE062B
Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback