Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory42.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 186
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 438
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8829) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 162
Parallax 152
126% 156 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 135
Splatting 119
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1246 1126 1829 1319 1655 1404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 2,417
Mixed 2313
SusWrite 1,430
468% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 87.8
278% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 472
351% 469 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 281%
Great: 614%
Xstar 480GB 480GB
111GB free
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 194 63 52 52 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.8% Good
Read 257
Write 241
Mixed 261
SusWrite 118
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 25
122% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 35.5
80% 161 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 91%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
649GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 123 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 121
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF Adata DDR4 3200 Adata DDR4 3200 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7FA5 BenQ EX3210R
Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $492
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback