PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
Memory | 28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 720 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20080229 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 23 '23 at 00:26 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
HP(103C 0936) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
|
6.04%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2883) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 85 69 73 65 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
435GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 85 82 80 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 58 | 60 | 24.1" | 1280 720 | RTK0001 HDMI |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |