Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 19:29
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 340
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 1501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 81.6
72% 86.3 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 71.7
70% 87.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001CBL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 365 390 406 92 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 362
Write 356
Mixed 320
SusWrite 268
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 32
102% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 197
157% 214 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 87%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
68GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 67.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 52.9
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
102GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 68 69 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 84.7
Write 80.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 67.6
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
630GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 169 171 173 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 98.2
Write 72.2
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 170
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4081CAA2F0MB2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 214 58 60 21.5" 1920 1017 HWP2867 HP ZR22w
Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback