Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 16:29
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,136
106% 883 Pts
64-Core 1361
84% 1361 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 312
Parallax 335
260% 322 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 258
Splatting 196
212% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 216%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$123
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,811
Write 3949
Mixed 3,146
743% 3,302 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 79.2
256% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 1,139
820% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 276% Great: 509%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
75GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,280
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,618
412% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.6
233% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1241
939% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 90.2
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
571GB free
Firmware: CC38
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 65.4
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C18-16GTZR F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C18-16GTZR F4-3600C18-16GTZN 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 46.1
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 34.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 47.3
104% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 39.7
101% 39.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 60 27" 1280 720 ACR052F XB271HU A
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback