Lenovo 20MVS0X600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20MVS0X600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MVS0X600
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 05:28
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 131
44% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 350
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5122) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 8.5
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 289 293 296 306 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 312
Write 273
Mixed 283
SusWrite 296
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 408
299% 391 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 81%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20MVS0X600 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20MVS0X600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback