Lenovo 81W4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81W4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 10:59
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 53.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 172
57% 104 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 781
85% 672 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 381C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 20.2
5% 14.1 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt512g TOSHIBA MEMORY 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 752 477 365 366 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,050
Write 777
Mixed 950
SusWrite 508
184% 821 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60.7
169% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 700
549% 762 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 162%
Great: 215%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 9.5 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 6.7
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 8.3
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 20.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W4 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback