Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD4H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 00:03
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 364
47% 356 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2300 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 111
Parallax 103
82% 105 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 103
Splatting 102
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
480GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 328 359 313 330 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 466
Write 421
Mixed 320
SusWrite 319
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 21.1
69% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 261
206% 288 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
78GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 146 140 141 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 460
Write 334
Mixed 352
SusWrite 154
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 41.6
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 175
168% 265 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 108%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
96GB free
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 99 7.5 194 182 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48% Average
Read 450
Write 373
Mixed 279
SusWrite 139
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 13.7
56% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 30.6
44% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
255GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 199 203 198 212 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.4% Good
Read 279
Write 223
Mixed 240
SusWrite 199
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 35.8
123% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 106
81% 109 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 115%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2TB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 177 168 173 170 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 145
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 172
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 126 122 125 121 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 168
Write 93.2
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 123
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-532.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 2560 1440 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback