Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 217 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 372 47% 358 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2300 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.8% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 112 Parallax 113 82% 108 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 103 Splatting 102 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 480GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 305 316 314 372 386 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 408 Write 398 Mixed 307 SusWrite 321 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 29.4 109% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 246 197% 278 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 78GB free Firmware: DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 140 141 140 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 468 Write 366 Mixed 362 SusWrite 156 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 40.7 135% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 173 168% 268 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 108%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 96GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 19 57 64 67 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 435 Write 277 Mixed 222 SusWrite 64.1 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 5.5 49% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 29.5 37% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 58%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 255GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 197 191 216 220 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.7% Good	Read 271 Write 216 Mixed 234 SusWrite 196 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 38.9 124% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 108 82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 115%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 174 173 176 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 177 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 174 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB 4,050 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 157 157 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 138 Write 116 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 157 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-532.A00LF 4x4GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	165	27"	2560 1440	ACR0490 XB271HU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	237x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	28x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16