Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory40.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 16:59
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 822
75% 630 Pts
64-Core 1275
79% 1275 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 107
Parallax 111
93% 111 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 41.6
57% 73.8 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 149 84 187 191 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 1,348
Mixed 799
SusWrite 206
240% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 36.9
129% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 148
157% 273 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 148%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
267GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 1289 1361 1288 1111 1119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,233
Write 1,540
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 1,209
346% 1,552 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 32
123% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 144
171% 319 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 218%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
536GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 111 78 152 195 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 470
Write 423
Mixed 390
SusWrite 167
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 34.8
117% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 201
160% 232 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 133%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 85 55 106 126 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 201
Write 212
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 107
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 15 60 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F54 BenQ SW320
Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $804
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback