Lenovo 82MG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory33.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 257
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 726
74% 598 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3A5B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 30.4
21% 28.3 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 21.7
21% 26.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,277
Write 1,103
Mixed 953
247% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 45.2
215% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 535
478% 719 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 28.2
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 19.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 82MG Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback