Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive542% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6604JI
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 218
2-Core 433
123% 242 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,462
137% 1,139 Pts
64-Core 3172
196% 3172 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1873) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 164
Parallax 180
153% 178 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 152
Splatting 109
133% 172 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 137%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000P5 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3510 3760 3417 3897 3835 3995 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
542% Outstanding
Read 3,898
Write 2,064
Mixed 2,899
SusWrite 3,736
706% 3,149 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 90.4
311% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,569
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,335
1,012% 1369 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 542%
Great: 557%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 61.1
MC Mixed 58.2
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 26
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 17 120 16" 1280 720 SDC4178
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback