Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive424% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory117.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime84.7 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 58.7
1-Core 220
2-Core 436
119% 238 Pts
4-Core 867
8-Core 1518
144% 1,192 Pts
64-Core 3,100
192% 3,100 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.6 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2287 4149 4153 4579 4850 4310 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 3,980
Mixed 2,509
SusWrite 4,055
710% 3,111 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 30.4
155% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 1,218
DQ Mixed 1,175
903% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 424%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905789-015.A00G Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 9905789-015.A00G Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 127GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.2" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback