Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive529% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6604JI
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 00:21
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 223
2-Core 430
125% 243 Pts
4-Core 830
8-Core 1,436
137% 1,133 Pts
64-Core 3,202
198% 3,202 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1873) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 162
Parallax 178
147% 174 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 150
Splatting 108
132% 170 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 133%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000P5 2TB
969GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3826 3891 4158 3882 4160 3902 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
529% Outstanding
Read 3060
Write 1,509
Mixed 2,876
SusWrite 3,970
643% 2,854 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 92.8
325% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,301
DQ Mixed 1455
1,083% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 529%
Great: 557%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 60.9
MC Mixed 57.7
173% 60.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 24.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 154%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback