Gigabyte GA-B760M H DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 233%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 12:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
124% 240 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,572
145% 1,213 Pts
64-Core 3,045
188% 3,045 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 266
Parallax 289
233% 280 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 244
Splatting 190
208% 265 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 200%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2421 2455 2358 1783 1567 1442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 2,482
Mixed 1666
SusWrite 2,004
467% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 54.1
277% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 1,456
DQ Mixed 614
608% 949 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 339%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical GA-B760M H DDR4 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback