| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-WW (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130531 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '23 at 23:06 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | IRN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
42% 313 Pts
|
20% 316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.66%
Terrible
|
0% 0.83 fps
|
1% 1.37 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 71 52 0.6 13 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
21% 97.7 MB/s
|
41% 13.4 MB/s
|
13% 18.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.5%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 35 | 22 | 60 | 19" | 1280 720 | SAM07CF SAMSUNG |
Typical GA-H61M-WW Builds (Compare 117 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-WW
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 23x |
| Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples | 15x |
| Pentium G2020Intel $92Bench 49%, 15,664 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 49x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $107 |