Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory29.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 231
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 549
62% 484 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4369
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 23.2
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 19.4
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 379 378 347 348 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,702
Write 759
Mixed 1051
SusWrite 389
216% 975 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 42.9
153% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 501
368% 495 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 161%
Great: 313%
Nvme Corsair MP600 CORE XT 2TB
324GB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 90 111 512 94 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 1,284
Mixed 1,310
SusWrite 334
238% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 53.1
179% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 528
374% 485 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 Kingston KF3200C20S4/32GX 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback