Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 287
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 39.6
24% 34 fps
MRender 43.2
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 31.1
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 69 87 61 53 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 204
Write 167
Mixed 175
SusWrite 75.9
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 14.4
64% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
15% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
90GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49% Average
Read 80.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 90.3
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
604GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 55.8
Write 22.6
Mixed 19
SusWrite 19.3
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
833GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 55.7
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 18.4
34% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 18 433 307 60 21.5" 1920 1080 HPN342E HP 22w
Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback