Acer Swift SFG16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SFG16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Lionfish_RTH
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 49.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 163
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 484
63% 474 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 169A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 26.6
18% 25.2 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 20.7
20% 25.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 902 262 366 378 378 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,421
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,234
SusWrite 554
352% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 42.4
230% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,139
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 737
638% 947 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 245%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 39.5
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 125%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 16" 1280 720 AUO0B9E
Typical Swift SFG16-71 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Swift SFG16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback