Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82QG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82QG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 17:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 43.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 314
89% 177 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 726
79% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 20.8
13% 19.2 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 17.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt1t02 LS KIOXIA 1TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 998 874 1156 711 455 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 999
Mixed 928
SusWrite 845
231% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 46.4
161% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 310
214% 270 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 167%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 30.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 15 100 13 60 16" 1707 1067 LEN8B9C
Typical 82QG Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback