Acer Predator PO3-620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-620
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 266
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 834
80% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,275
79% 1,275 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 87
Parallax 98.8
83% 95.8 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 80.3
80% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,544
Write 1,554
Mixed 1,388
334% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 61.9
212% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 778
608% 843 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 217%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
56GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 128 106 119 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 151
Write 141
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 124
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 107%
G-drive ev (Gen2) 1TB
96GB free
Firmware: 000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 41.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 41.8
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 24" 1920 1080 GSM5B73 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Predator PO3-620 Builds (Compare 2,876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $735
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback