Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Stonic_RNS
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 04:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 188
60% 112 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 542
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1455) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.22.03
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 20.7
11% 29.3 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 18
Splatting 17.7
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 17%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 1447) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 50.7
44% 53 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 43.9
42% 52.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 362 294 279 306 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 915
Write 1,031
Mixed 830
SusWrite 364
176% 785 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 25.8
95% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 624
468% 631 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-44 Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback