PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180516 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '23 at 18:49 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
41.7%
Average
|
54% 89.8 Pts
|
22% 160 Pts
|
11% 181 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
89.1%
Excellent
|
91% 112 fps
|
86% 107 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 36 37 47 36 38 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
71% 317 MB/s
|
117% 39.7 MB/s
|
205% 303 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 143 144 143 142 MB/s
|
85.5%
Excellent
|
88% 122 MB/s
|
130% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
242GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 50 49 54 52 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
35% 47.8 MB/s
|
111% 0.7 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
522GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 73 88 89 92 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
63% 86.4 MB/s
|
121% 0.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Avexir DDR4-2400 CL16 16GB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2448 MHz
|
60%
Above average
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
61% 21.2 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 32 | 6 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1017 | SAM0D92 S24D330 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 6,727x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $59Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 3,725x |
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 1,061x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2,201x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1,392x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1,269x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $891 |