Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 109
51% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 174
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 8587) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 21.8
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 186 196 214 201 142 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.6% Above average
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 196
SusWrite 186
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 32.9
108% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 32.9
26% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 124%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
15GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 54 64 63 61 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 47
Write 50.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 60.6
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 61%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 54 64 63 61 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 129
Write 117
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 60.8
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 19.5" 1280 720 GSM5B01 LG IPS WSXGA
Typical GA-EP45T-DS3R Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback