Supermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPG-QT
Memory989.7 GB free of 1024 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 07:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6154
CPU1, 2 CPU, 36 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 43.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
67% 129 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 917
81% 688 Pts
64-Core 3,836
237% 3,836 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 429 427 419 397 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 432
Mixed 310
SusWrite 409
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 31.9
111% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 269
218% 309 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10.5TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 114 87 141 85 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
Read 321
Write 96.6
Mixed 260
SusWrite 104
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 22.7
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 52.1
74% 147 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM1-CRC 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 0 0" 1280 720
Typical SYS-7049GP-TRT Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

System: Supermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback