Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 907
88% 721 Pts
64-Core 1363
84% 1363 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 190
Parallax 230
167% 208 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 164
Splatting 122
150% 195 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S071
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 255 52 42 47 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 500
Write 379
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 114
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 18.1
70% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 16.7
30% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52%
Great: 101%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
275GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 368 436 440 390 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 431
Mixed 450
SusWrite 386
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 46.7
155% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 188
146% 200 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
205GB free
Firmware: P052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 54 55 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 460
Write 410
Mixed 409
SusWrite 83.7
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 41.5
141% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 187
145% 198 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
50GB free
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 288 329 336 340 327 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 490
Write 320
Mixed 108
SusWrite 308
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 11.2
50% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 14.2
13% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 165 162 163 165 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 34.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F55 C32JG5x
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback