Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 19:23
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 125
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 366
37% 300 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1402 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 39
21% 38.1 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 37.4
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 334 328 348 347 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 357
Write 341
Mixed 283
SusWrite 338
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 38.5
115% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 53.5
43% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 137%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
4GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 287
Write 131
Mixed 170
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 18
68% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 22.3
18% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
375GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 118 143 139 145 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 128
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 137
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
162GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 76 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 102
Write 94.4
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 77.6
109% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
191GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 169
Write 157
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 82.3
161% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%
WDC WD15 EARS-60MVWB0 1.5TB
309GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 80.6
Write 82.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 82
103% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 0P 5R 10G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 40% 47 203 59 75 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC154 PHL 223V7
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback