Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 121
59% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 323
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 51.8
35% 44.9 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 37.7
37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
7GB free
Firmware: CS900612
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 310
Write 257
Mixed 240
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 29.4
123% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 156
132% 191 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 82 53 64 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 79.1
Write 83.3
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 64.4
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
36GB free
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 73 72 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 65.6
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 73
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 50%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
849GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 172 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 170
201% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ RMR5030ED58E8W1600 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback