Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 70 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 125 52% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 319 34% 272 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1402 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 49.4 Parallax 39.1 20% 37.9 fps	MRender 52.1 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 37 32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 614GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 324 342 335 353 354 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 290 Write 255 Mixed 288 SusWrite 327 66% 290 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 26.5 85% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 39.4 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 49.4 40% 55 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 137%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4GB free Firmware: SBFA15.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 208 Write 116 Mixed 126 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 13.5 48% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 19.9 DQ Mixed 20.4 16% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 375GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 93 100 101 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 172 Write 176 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 99 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2621 1TB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 162GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 103 Write 91.5 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 77.4 111% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 191GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 81 83 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 165 Write 170 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 81.6 168% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 67%
WDC WD15 EARS-60MVWB0 1.5TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 309GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 81 83 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 83.2 Write 82.7 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 81.4 104% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 4,160 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 0P 4R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	18%	91	284	26	75	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC154 PHL 223V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	157x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	65x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	24x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369