Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V4.1
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 20:26
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 197 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 538 59% 465 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 6555) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8831 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 44.4 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 41.7 36% 42.7 fps	MRender 43.7 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 36.7 32% 40 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7849 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 888 (B1) Unknown 91 91 174 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 38 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32656573866	103% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 404 Mixed 409 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 38.4 143% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 90.7 128% 238 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 683GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 171 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8994 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1117 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 91814 (C2) HDA temperature 119 95 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	72.1% Very good	Read 124 Write 127 Mixed 121 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.33 116% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB GKH800SO51208-1600 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V4.1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	5x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	3x

SSD
SSD Plus 480GBSanDisk $40Bench 53%, 16,752 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 54%, 664 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16