Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 164 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 307 36% 277 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.2 4% 4.03 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 115 109 113 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 435 Write 118 Mixed 148 SusWrite 114 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 27.6 114% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 145 129% 201 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 5,247 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 20.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	43x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $255

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16