Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory244 GB free of 256 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 00:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w7-3465X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 192
2-Core 376
111% 214 Pts
4-Core 721
8-Core 1,070
112% 896 Pts
64-Core 4,586
284% 4,586 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 405C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 208
Parallax 200
175% 208 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 146
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 374
Mixed 427
322% 427 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4.5
773% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 128%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 68.5TB
63.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,895
Write 13.3
Mixed 24.9
461% 645 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 3.6
2,468% 17.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965791-028.A00G 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4010 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
396% Outstanding
MC Read 158
MC Write 194
MC Mixed 160
489% 171 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 153%
This bench: 396%
Great: 407%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 AMZ0000 FireTV
Typical Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 429%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,949
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback