Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X1400EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X1400EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230602
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 236
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 575
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 21.5
16% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 13.3
14% 17 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 604 472 182 332 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,742
Write 1,013
Mixed 873
SusWrite 427
224% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 59.4
201% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 404
289% 375 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 174%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 14.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X1400EA Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X1400EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback