TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B250M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 23:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 576
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 72.6%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 291
Parallax 327
251% 309 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 252
Splatting 181
204% 261 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 209%
 Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 79 78 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 455
Mixed 424
SusWrite 79
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 45.3
149% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 136
163% 284 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 86.7%
 Great: 128%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
262GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 98
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 69.9%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7202 QBQ90S
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B250M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 4,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H - $110

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples889x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples861x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples566x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples703x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples537x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples330x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples169x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples119x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples113x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples90x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples84x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples69x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback