TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B250M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 554
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 294
Parallax 335
258% 315 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 256
Splatting 185
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 213%
 Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 180 78 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 458
Mixed 423
SusWrite 132
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 46.5
158% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 92.9%
 Great: 128%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
300GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 90 92 90 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 83.5
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 89.9
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 55.7%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 70.8%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7202 QBQ90S
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B250M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 4,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H - $110

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples889x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples861x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples566x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples703x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples537x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples330x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples169x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples119x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples113x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples90x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples84x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples69x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback