Asrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ac (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200518
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 21:14
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 95.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 235 87% 152 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 772 73% 606 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385 21,427 User benchmarks, average bench 145% Gigabyte(1458 4112) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte RTX 4060Ti 16GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 202 Parallax 221 181% 215 fps	MRender 306 Gravity 170 Splatting 128 156% 201 fps
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 157%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,263 Write 2,140 Mixed 1,399 430% 1,934 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 64.3 206% 70.6 MB/s	DQ Read 935 DQ Write 764 DQ Mixed 836 630% 845 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Transcend SSD320 512GB-$324 126 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 166GB free Firmware: 5.4.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 150 139 166 96 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 153 Write 122 Mixed 196 SusWrite 138 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 13.4 54% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 53.9 47% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2999, 2999, 2999, 2999 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 38.9 MC Mixed 30.4 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 28.5 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 52.4 76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	31.5"	2560 1369	ACR067E ED323QUR A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ac Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 177%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 176%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ac

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	88x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	43x
Core i5-10600KIntel $141Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	39x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	63x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	59x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	40x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	34x
SX6000LNP 1TBAdataBench 191%, 7,052 samples	19x
SX8100NP 512GBAdataBench 226%, 9,167 samples	19x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	15x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	11x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16