Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X5329 F/B620  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 187
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 530
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 93.9
Parallax 59.6
49% 71.1 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 51.8
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 13 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
86GB free
Firmware: SAI20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 218 73 44 58 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.9% Good
Read 243
Write 222
Mixed 229
SusWrite 114
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 33
132% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 130
110% 161 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 102%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
278GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 130 130 130 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 127
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 131
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
139GB free
Firmware: W0406B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 44 26 29 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
Typical Erazer X5329 F/B620 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback